In order to cope with the growing number of legal actions, the huge recruitment of new judges in the French administrative courts through supplementary entrance examinations over the last ten years has resulted in a diversification of the kinds of capital which are effective in the field of the national administrative justice. This article provides an analysis of the distribution of capital in the administrative courts of first instance and appeal (except the Council of State), and seeks to define how that sociological evolution can influence the very contents of the juridical decisions, subject to further studies for each court.